Find Friend(s)
KPOP Lounge


Protestors gather before Leessang Gary's home after forced eviction

By alim17   Friday, July 8, 2016   156,070   5,730   57



  1. Google+

As promised, Mr. Suh (39) and others of the 'Meeting of Those Who Want to Comfortably Do Business' gathered the other day before Leessang member Gary's home to protest their forced eviction.

Previously, it was reported that Leessang purchased real estate worth millions before running into problems with a tenant who runs a tripe business, Mr. Suh, ultimately allowing him to do his business in the basement and parking lot before the Gangnam District real estate office forcefully evicted Mr. Suh on the grounds his business was being run illegally.

SEE ALSO: [OP-ED] Is EXP Edition Really K-Pop? The Answer Isn't So Simple

Since then, the former tenant and the organization complained to Leessang, gathering before Gary's home at 3 PM the other day with signs for a protest and press conference. Through the first-floor entrance intercom for the apartments, Mr. Suh tried to get through to Gary, but received no response. Mr. Suh promised, "I will come find you until you meet up with me."

Meanwhile, the organization posted a video of the protestors before Gary's home via its official Facebook, even writing, "This angers us."

Even before the assembly, Mr. Suh said, "I want to personally meet up with Leessang and talk. A humane apology for hurting us and causing us pain all this time should come first. Psy first set up a meeting to openly talk about the hurt both sides inflicted on each other and he sincerely apologized. You have to apologize not only to me but also to all of the merchants banded together."

  1. Leessang
  2. Gary

daFoolio Monday, July 11, 2016

wtf.... AKP ads are outta control now!!

nexzco Sunday, July 10, 2016

I haven't seen an answer here besides saying the tenant is an idiot and don't blame leessang. This is probably gonna get buried or down voted to oblivion. Basically imo, from what I read the tenant was initially told they can't do business because it's illegal back in 2013. After much deliberation, Leessang let this tripe business do business in the basement/parking lot instead. But again they were faced with orders to cease the business as it was illegal. They dragged it on for a few years and finally they are kicked out and they are blaming Leessang for letting them do business in the first place. Essentially, why did you even let us do business here if it's illegal. A large chunk of my business is goodwill asset (e.g. Loyal customer base). Kicking me out is basically losing all my customers. Arguably, the tenant should have verified it was OK to do business and not simply rely on the owners due diligence. But again, all this is based on info I read on allkpop which basically means there are holes in the story everywhere.

chiyasuho Sunday, July 10, 2016

hmm i dont understand but wht is this about?kang gary or lessang?

Itismoot Sunday, July 10, 2016


Ryo69 Saturday, July 9, 2016

You f**k with the law, The law f**ks you up! It's not personal, it's business!

sikacorona Saturday, July 9, 2016

has nothing to do with them if its against code its against code period.

hiroonakamura Saturday, July 9, 2016

why are the tenants mad at LeeSsang when it was the "Gangnam District real estate office" that evicted the dude?

L_catzzz Saturday, July 9, 2016

When tenants feels more entitled to the place than the owners~

kinginthenorth Saturday, July 9, 2016

B-But... his business is illegal, and it was Gary's building (?)He was not the one to evict them in the first place??

junxxmin Saturday, July 9, 2016

Wait... am i the only one confused?? He was unlawfully on property that Gary rightfully owns and was kind enough to lend.. then authority kicks him out  and now he's somehow complaining? Can someone explain this whole concept of like tenants and evictions... unless i missed the whole point idk why he's so upset when he's not even entitled to be

junxxmin Saturday, July 9, 2016

*side note i know what the deff of tenant and evictions that was supposed to be sarcasm but i utterly failed at it oops XD basically "what does this guy think the definition of eviction is" because it must greatly differ from the one i know =.=

sikacorona junxxmin Saturday, July 9, 2016

lol i got it

Load More Comments




  1. Follow us on Instagram
  2. Subscribe on Youtube
  3. Follow us on Google+