59

42

News
Posted by emmamadison2410,984 pts Thursday, July 25, 2019

More insight into Daesung's controversial Gangnam building + reportedly legally responsible as owner

Interest regarding Big Bang Daesung's Gangnam building that's under suspicion of being a front for illegal prostitution activities is growing.

Daesung's building is located in the center of Hakdong, at the intersection of a 3-way station about 660m away from Apgujeong station on Bundang line. Around the Hakdong intersection there are apartments, schools, banks, wedding halls, parks, plastic surgery clinics, coffee shops, restaurants, theaters, and concert halls, all categorized as promising commercial districts.

There's a Starbucks on the first floor of the building with outdoor billboards on the rooftop which also generate separate income. Daesung purchased the building in 2017 using bank loans for 31 billion won and has so far added about 14 billion won in equity. Monthly rental income is reportedly about 100 million won. The building is set to grow in price even more due to the Warye-Sinsa rail line that's scheduled to open in the area in 2026.

ë¹…ë±… 대성 ì†Œìœ ì˜ 빌딩 /다음 지도 갈무리

According to Daesung's real estate agent, there's no way Daesung could have known the complex was being used as a front for illegal activities as the businesses began operations in 2005 and Daesung only reviewed the "details of the lease" before purchase.

The agent said, "Daesung is only a building owner and has nothing to do with the business. If we find out that the tenants were using the complex to run illegal entertainment activities we will terminate our contracts with them."

However, controversy is growing because owners are responsible for maintaining their buildings. Even if Daesung didn't know, as the owner, he won't be able to avoid responsibility.

채널A 갈무리

채널A 갈무리
  1. Daesung
94 48,261 Share 58% Upvoted
 
Toan_Opinion
Toan_Opinion179 pts Thursday, July 25, 2019 24
Thursday, July 25, 2019

So a building has business from 2005, no article about it, no article when Daesung bought it in 2017, he look at the details of the store and it has no problem, he bought it. he owns the building and lent it to other to do business, then go to military. And now, in the years YG has so much trouble, some stupid Channel A put a headlight "DAESUNG's building, illigaled activities, it's all Daesung responsibility????" OMG I just want to burn K-media and Knet into dust.

16 (+29 / -13)
Share

24 more replies

 
pink_oracle
pink_oracle26,042 pts Thursday, July 25, 2019 15
Thursday, July 25, 2019

Same as in my country, if you're the lease holder what happens in that building is your legal responsibility. So be sure to make surprise visits regularly.

11 (+20 / -9)
Share

15 more replies

SHOW ALL COMMENTS

allkpop in your Inbox

THE TOP 10 STORIES DELIVERED DAILY
New Message

SEND