Upvote if you think more people should see this post!

11

7

News
Posted by KHJUSAfan 22 days ago

Prosecution take Kim Hyun Joongs Ex girlfriend to Supreme Court

https://entertain.v.daum.net/v/gRVSuuzEqB?f=p


As Reported in Star news...


It seems Prosection in the Criminal Case against Kim Hyun Joong ex girlfriend Choi Hye Mi is still not satisfied with the Penalty imposed on Choi Hye Mi for the crimes of Fraud and Defemation. They have Appealed to the Supreme Court asking that Choi Hye Mi be given one year and four months in prision on her convictions for fraud and defemation. The issue isnt disagreement with the conviction as she was properly found guilty of her crimes beyound a reasonable doubt. Thus Prosecution argues that 5 million won penalty is to soft a punishment in light of the gravity of her crimes.

14 Share 61% Upvoted

9

Mich_le 22 days ago 1
22 days ago

i just hope that she doesn't resent her child and end up hurting him. The poor child is the victim in all of this.

Share

8

teleri 21 days ago 0
21 days ago

That poor child needs to be with his FATHER, seeing as his mum has been proven to be borderline psycho :(

Share

5

Daydreamer68154 21 days ago 1
21 days ago

Ms. Choi did a lot of damage to KHJ's professional career at the time. Using that time to go into military helped him but she was terrible to him and his parents. He should get full custody and I bet that is what all of this is leading toward. I think she should not be able to just walk away with a hefty fine. She viciously attacked his character in false statements and stories. She caused several fans to walk away from him in support of her being a victim which was untrue. Her story is a sad one. Domestic violence is terrible. It is shameful to use that platform creating a story against someone who is innocent. The prosecutor wants justice for KHJ but it also sends a statement that men can fall victim, as well, by being falsely accused.

Share

3

Great_Turtle 18 days ago 0
18 days ago

From what ive read though he has admitted responsibility for the child because she dropped the paternity case against him he has no legal rights to the boy(atm)....for him to have those rights they would have had to be married(thank god they not) a court to give them to him or Choi to agree to give them to him(probably for money)...

I think if he wanted custody he or his lawyers made an error in the original paternity suite by challenging it though I understand why they did because they had no evidence the child was his(and still don't legally) ...it has kinda set a precedent because she could argue in court that them contesting the original paternity case was admission that he thinks the child isnt his(weirdly her dropping it suggests the same thing)

Share

3

teleri 21 days ago 0
21 days ago

EXCELLENT!!!!

Share

2

krell 21 days ago 3
21 days ago

I am NOT so clear that putting Ms. CHOI in JAIL would help much overall with the 'best interests' of the child involved. I realize that KHJ Fans have real reasons to DISLIKE Ms. CHOI. I suppose, IF that Ms. CHOI is put in JAIL, that KHJ would THEN be in better position to legally attempt (via COURT activity) a FULL CUSTODY situation of his child for himself.

Share

3

Great_Turtle 18 days ago 2
18 days ago

To do that KHJ needs to prove legally he`s the father ATM he isnt,her dropping the paternity case is very suspicious to me I can think of only two reasons for it ...either he`s not the father or she was worried KHJ would go for custody(he`s a man and its Korea so he`d get it)

Share

1

Moriah 15 days ago 0
15 days ago

I'm with you on this. I have nagging doubts about paternity. If the child was KHJ's she would be wanting child support. She asked for 3 times the legal amount of support allowed - and then dropped it? I think your reasons are valid or because paternity test was rigged and she knew she was pushing it. His saying "child" or "son" could be a mix of poor translation, saying "child" could be simply not wanting to label a child, any child even hers, illegitimate on public media. My bet? NOT his child.

Share

0

krell 18 days ago 0
18 days ago

Again, I would *suggest* that KHJ should move LEGALLY (via LAWYER and COURT activity) to determine in a COURT RECORD valid manner, IF that he IS or is NOT the father of the child (along with Ms. CHOI). I suspect that a 'forced' DNA Testing option would be LEGALLY open to KHJ. That KHJ seems NOT to be actively doing this, forcing DNA Testing that provides a PERMANENT COURT RECORD as to him being the father (or not), seems ODD to me. YOU can see that any way you want. As to IF that a COURT would inevitably award KHJ the SOLE CUSTODY of his child (versus Ms. CHOI), I am NOT so clear on that notion either. Again, YOU can see it any way that you want.

Share

1

The_full_truth 21 days ago 1
21 days ago

Has he announced that the child is really his? I noticed in KHJ's recent press release, he repeatedly called him "the child" not "my son."

Share

2

KHJUSAfan 21 days ago 0
21 days ago

i have seen traslations where its my son and others the child and even one article where it was my son for not having seen and the child for i dont want harmed.

I havent seen original hangul so i cabt run ot through ttanslator apps to check

Share

-1

melon 21 days ago 2
21 days ago

I don't think that's possible if she still has custody

Share

0

KHJUSAfan 17 days ago 0
17 days ago

even if she has custody right now. if KHJ has cause to believe the child is his he has legal right to petition the court for paternity ruling. court would then order another dna test because its a new case. if the dna test shows KHJ as the father he then has all legal rights and responsibilities. and has to determine if he wants to for sole custody both physical and legal or for full custody and visitation with joint legal ect.. there aee several options.. any ruling giving choi physical custody more than 50 percent of the time will result in child support paid to choi. conversly if the child isnt his Choi faces the possibility of one hell of a fraud and defemation case again. one the media would probably jump all over unless there was an injunction in place to prevent them from reporting it for sake of the child. in that senerio KHJ can never get put from.under public perception that he is the father... see how messed up this whole situation is



Share

0

Wang_LouisXIV 13 days ago 0
13 days ago

In South Korea there is a distinction between custody and parental rights. Custody is just who has the right to see and the ability to have the child stay with them. but further decisions such as medical, legal, and educational proxy are only available to those with Parental Rights. Which is why despite the court granting khj and ms. choi joint custody rights is somewhat pointless. as the sole legal parent, Ms. Choi can enforce the custody rights of her child as she sees fit. In order to have an enforcement of custody rights for himself, KHJ would have to get legal Parental rights established, Great_turtle pointed out the 3 ways that is possible in an excellent post above, I wonder if they've been reading my postings on other sites...

Share
TWICE
25 minutes ago   0

allkpop in your Inbox