Once again, you utter fuckwit, the evidence pertained to ADOR, not HYBE, that is why it wasn't accepted. The police investigations have no relevance to the injunction and haven't even concluded yet.
Fuck you're dumb, its a miracle you can function in your day to day life without written instructions ๐
They would've won the injunction if their allegations were true and just. And, all of a sudden, they have all the damning evidence to win future trials? Fucking idiot ๐
No prizes for second dear. You're a fool that has no idea how the legal system works....and it shows ๐คฃ
Yeah, sure. Thinking that a company that had all their presented cases rejected and lost a simple injunction is suddenly going to come out with damning evidence in a trial. The injunction should've been a walk in the park for them. Especially, if all these "IF's" were true.
.
Bye.
FALSE. Fucking idiot ๐
I'm grown the FUCK up.
Quite obviously you aren't, not intellectually or maturity wise.
You have been wrong in every instance.
You're boring me now.
Bye.
You need to calm the FUCK down. Literally, the angriest person I've come across on this site..... and that is saying something.
You need to grow the FUCK up.
All the future lawsuits are going to be related to the initial accusations. Just nit-picked and presented in a different way. It's not like a difference of a theft case to a murder case. What we saw in the injunction trial is indicative of their stance in future cases.
.
Had MHJ barely got off and won her trial, I'd be inclined to believe that she's committed some sort of crime that can be later used against her. But when the decision was overwhelmingly in her favor and she was acquitted of everything HYBE has accused her of, it's quite suggestive to forthcoming trials.
FALSE.
You're a fucking idiot.... truly. There was no trial, it was an INJUNCTION, which is nothing like a trial. She was not "acquitted" of anything you absolute dumbfuck, there was no trial to be "acquitted" from. Nor were all the allegations against her presented during the injunction, that wasn't the place for it. You don't have the first clue what you are talking about and are now just spouting off like the ignorant lunatic you are.
Not all evidence has been released to the media, nor was it presented at the injunction because why would it be, it was irrelevant to an injunction. ALL the evidence, which we have not seen... that was all sent to the police. The police investigations into her alleged criminality are still ongoing.
You are literally the stupidest person I have come across on this site..... and that is saying something.
Again, if they canโt win a simple injunction case, then itโs a pretty clear sign they have a poor stance on any bigger legal cases theyโll go forward with. Itโs just an ego battle for BSH.
FALSE.
Wrong again. The results of the injunction has no bearing on any future lawsuits.
They have no proven "IF's" against her, as she was involved in no criminal acts. They can wait out the investigation and carry on with more lawsuits, but what exactly do they have on her?
.
All those texts that "supported" their reasoning that she was conspiring a "hostile takeover" were deemed invalid by the court. All they're doing is tarnishing their reputation every time they try to disrupt her position.
FALSE
Are you a detective or investigator involved with the police investigations? NO, you are NOT.
Do you have ALL the evidence presented to HYBE by the ADOR whistle-blower and all the evidence the audit produced? NO you do NOT, so you cannot claim she wasn't involved in criminal acts, the same as I can't claim she was, I can however state that it is "alleged" she was, only the police can give definitive answers and since the investigations aren't over we won't know either way until they are concluded.
The evidence rejected by the courts was rejected because it didn't pertain to HYBE but to ADOR. The judge said there WAS evidence of the things she has been accused of but it had no bearing on the injunction. He was very clever in his closing statement as those words can now be used in any future lawsuits against her.
Well, if they can't even win a single case on the injunction, I'd say they don't have a good case on anything.
What a moronic comment, as expected from someone who doesn't know how the legal and justice systems work.
If the "evidence" can be proven true, they would have won. It was deemed invalid because either it can be interpreted other ways or can be fabricated. As stated by the court, Hybe cannot dismiss Mhj on the basis of breach of trust. If they really really want her gone, they can still dismiss her anytime they want because they own 80% of Ador. They just have pay for her severance (this is also stated by the court). The whole lawsuit is about Hybe tried to dismiss Mhj without paying her a dime.
They are waiting for the results of the police investigations before making their next move. Not paying her out until all investigations are completed is smart. "IF" she has behaved in a criminal manner and committed illegal acts then she is out on her ass without payment.
The previous decision involving the courts was only for an injunction in regards to HYBEs voting rights, it was not in regards to criminal allegations that have been made against her, any other lawsuits "IF" they happen haven't even been brought against her yet.
In case you're not aware, quite literally, every single accusation and "evidence" that HYBE presented in the trial was deemed invalid by the court.
FALSE. That was only for an injunction against HYBES voting rights. No other lawsuits have been presented to the courts as the police investigation is still ongoing.


๐คฃ Oh sweetheart. If they've had so much evidence, they would've easily won the injunction, exercised their voting rights to remove her from her position, and then, use the police investigation findings along with their damning evidence to get additional criminal charges on her, and that's that. I guess it was all planned out to lose the injunction in the first place, right? You should've been HYBE's lawyer instead ๐คฃ