yes you are right, this article states that, but first why would a wife meet the other side and discuss it. I am just saying that the only fact is that guy is an idiot.

Just for example, the wife meets A (not sure why she would do that but still) and A says yes it is his child he took all my money, i cannot pay for abortion if he does not find money I’ll have to give a birth. Wife sees his money as theirs and take it personally.

Just example how it could have been said. We simply don’t have enough info and I might be 100% wrong may be A is a con artist and there is not even a child she is extorting the money.

This article is putting emphasis on other women instead of the actual perpetrator- the guy! He had parallel relationships, made one pregnant, is being sued by multiple parties and blackmails wife to pay off his debts and fines in order to divorce him. That is where the problem is - the guy!

hm i read it differently, it is two wronged women and one horrible man. This article is not giving any info about the other women or whole situation it is tripped out of context. We inly know that other side wants to sue him (we don’t know what for at all, may be she borrowed him huge amount and he spent all her savings, or he lied to her as well since marriage is only 3 months and their relationship was a year, we simply do not have enough info). The only fact here is that the guy is truly something, the best she can do is run away from him, people like that never change. 

Corruption is prevalent in developing and under developed countries even more. South Korea seems to be one of the most corrupt among developed countries.

a normal person wouldn't have this same special treatment

If you read korean news, you will know that they stopped being a sponsor of the drama and also stopped playing his commercial in tv, because viewers didn't like to see his face.  That's what I mean. Sorry for any mistakes. English is not my native language

I'm talking about his Pura chicken commercial. 

Unfortunately, in Korea, public opinion and good reputation are very important. 
Jung Hae-in just lost some advertising contracts, because viewers were furious and refused to see his face in the commercials.

I have indeed watched the drama. Many of the victims who have openly criticized it have said they have watched the drama as well. I'm now waiting for episodes 3 to 5, which I suspect will focus on the love story and ignore all historical and political elements they put in. Just because we may not agree with the interpretation you have taken does not mean that we have not watched the drama. You gave an example of cherry picking, without realizing that you cherry picked our view of the drama and without knowing assigned us as people who have not watched it, just because we did not share your view, as if the very idea of differing opinions means nothing. Here is the problem SOME see in these episodes. You say "The NSA is clearly depicted as the evil ones" of course. Because the evil they are choosing to portray is an evil that is "justifiable". It's like showing a concentration camp with Nazi's killing Jewish people in the most horrific ways, but instead of showing them as innocent victims you show the Jewish prisoners as "spies" "criminals" "direct threats to the government" "trying to impose communism" etc. When they were not, they were normal and innocent Jewish people. You end up portraying the holocaust as a "cause and effect" in place for a supposed wrongdoing, when it was not, it was genocide. You are still portraying the Nazi's as heartless but you are painting those murdered as criminals. The NSA in the drama are after NK spies and communist, meaning they are portraying their mission as justifiable as it is more or less what the current NSA does now. The problem is that in reality the NSA were never going after NK spies, they were going after SK (mostly students) and claiming them to be so. That's why SOME people think this drama is inappropriate. The notion that the NSA at the time were torturing and killing NK spies is false, they always knew they were killing SK people. So no, is not that we think they are portraying them as rainbows and sunshine, nope it's not that. It's that they are portraying what they did wrong. Many regime supporters, ultra right wing politicians and people who worked and benefited directly from the regime are still in complete denial that under their office of government the NSA committed these crimes, the victims have never received any apology. Why? Well because these people (criminals) are still in such a denial of history that they claim what Snowdrop is portraying is the truth. "Oh no, the NSA didn't kill innocent SK's, no they were only after NK spies" that's the problem. What Snowdrop is portraying is the lie that the NSA and the regime made up and what some people insist blindly that is the truth. By making the protagonist a NK spy that was posing as a student, that becomes yet another slap in the face as many of those murdered by the NSA were students who were falsely painted as NK spies to the public. The regime and the NSA at the time pushed that notion, that colleges were filled with spies who were trying to take the country down. In reality it was filled with students fighting for democracy. So to portray a NK spy hiding as a student, was bound to receive backlash when it was such a huge part of why the student movement was targeted. It also in terms of the drama makes no sense, since if we assume that a NK spy would be in SK during the time the last thing they would choose is to pose as a student when they were the most watched and controlled by the regime, but that's more fictional preference. By choosing him to pose as a student, you are once again feeding in to the political propaganda the NSA had made out to kill students to begin with. The drama is also based mostly on the false propaganda created by the NSA and the regime of the supposed NK spy presence in the election of 1987. You see a pattern? NK spies and NK influence is almost the entire basis of this drama, and that is a historical inaccuracy. It was all a guise for the NSA and the regime to silence their opponents who wanted the end of the military oppressive government. Now this plot could have worked better in the future, could have worked better in another context, could have worked better when this was over but sadly this tragedy is still not over. The people responsible and the people who suffered are still alive and they have received no closure, because of the very thing the drama is pushing, the ever present lie that the criminals keep trying to push. The intention behind the drama is no longer what matters, is the fact that once you make a drama that is actively pushing a political agenda that still is present today, you end up making a drama that will be enabling people to keep siding with it, keep denying the truth. So yes, that's the problem with the drama it implies a political agenda that is still alive and being fought against by Koreans, it has become a vehicle to push forward once more the false propaganda, that all the people who died and who were tortured by the NSA were NK spies. That the NSA had to do it to preserve the fairness of the elections. All lies, that still have to be battled against by SK's. So no, just because some don't agree with the show, don't interpret it the way that you might have it does not mean they have not watched it, it simply means they disagree from you. That's something you must accept, because calling victims of this history out for not watching it and claiming that they should wait to see when the plot is already harmful by itself, is not it. Let's kindly agree to disagree, not make delusions of grandeur you cannot assume let alone prove.

Thank you very much, though I personally knew so if my comments could be misinterpreted I welcome the corrections necessary so it remains clear. Yes the NSA still exist (under another name) and in part do work with stopping spies, but as you say Koreans are angry about how the NSA is being portrayed in this drama, a time period which I think most Koreans think of firstly when they hear of the NSA. They are portraying them falsely and as a result portraying the victims falsely. Choosing to portray the false propaganda as real is naturally enabling ultra right wing and regime supporters who believe that Snowdrop is what has happened and do not want to apologize for the crimes. I tried to put myself in the shoes of a loved one of someone who was murdered by the NSA during the regime, murdered by being falsely accused as a greater system to silence and oppress the nation, and to then see that this drama is portraying that loved one's and all the other victims as exactly the lie used to rob them away from me... it's so beyond hurtful let alone insensitive. I've been thinking so long on how much I'm flabbergasted that out of all the fictional narratives they could have chosen to present, they chose to use the real lie that killed and oppressed thousands as real? Knowing that the situation is fresh, yet to be apologized for and that what they are portraying is what the criminals incessantly try to push? ... it's just... wow. Again thank you very much, it's very important to remain as clear as possible as I don't want to misinform anyone. Thank you and if you celebrate the holiday Have a very Merry Christmas!

The Dictatorship and the NSA together made up a false propaganda that the nation was being infiltrated by NK spies, both in the election and out of it. This as I stated is false, the NSA's job was not to kill or hunt down NK spies/ communists (as the drama shows) it was to torture and kill SK pro democracy supporters, they only made up the NK spy rumor so that they could do so.  By choosing to portray the NSA as an institution that fights against communist you are actively forming part of the lie the Dictatorship made up to silence and kill their opponents. It is in this way that drama is being accused of portraying the Dictatorship falsely. Before I am yet again asked why this could potentially be harmful, some people, by this I mean politicians of the right wing and some who worked for the regime, still have not apologized for the crimes they committed and try to push what Snowdrop is portraying as the truth of what happened which it was not. This is why some people believe that this drama in their efforts to create historical fiction, intentionally or unintentionally adopts the political agenda of those criminals. This is very recent history and very sensitive to Koreans since the rich right elite class are still in denial, this is all very hurtful for victims. I think maybe possibly in a long time this could work but now, when so many victims and the nation is actively fighting to obliterate this false notion, it seems out of place and harmful to make a drama that actively portrays the lie the nation wants once and for all to stop regime supporters to believe. I hope that the drama distance themselves more and more from this and focus on the relationship between the characters.

Yep dude is definitely sexy bruh...Since "Matrimonial chaos" i got my eyes locked on him.I remember that at first i mistaked him as Kim Kyung Nam from "Come n Hug me".

After reading the article on Koreaboo, I suddenly think of that possibility as well. Her, meeting various men, is such a question on the pregnancy for me.

I think the classmates of Kim seon ho testimonies has nothing to do with the accusations of his girlfriend. In my own opinion, the woman should not be blamed for what she did. Women should always be respected no matter what, I think ONLY KIM SEON HO AND THE GIRL knows who is really telling the truth, we are all saying our opinion BASED ON THE FACTS given to us, But if you will just think it over, NOBODY AMONG US REALLY KNEW WHAT HAPPENED. Please don't blame the girl and also, I believe firmly that women will not talk about sensitive matters like this if it is not true..for Kim seon ho, his words that he was careless means he admitted that he has done something wrong and I admire him to accept his shortcomings and to stand up again, and to show the world he is just human and human commits mistake...NOBODY IS PERFECT

There are people who get engage but still break up, couples who get married and get divorced, gf and bf who promise each other they will be together forever but end up not doing it. Relationships fail sometimes and promises are broken. That’s part of life, some relationships just don’t last and people fall out of love. It just wasn’t meant to be. Heck his ex married a guy and divorced him after 17days.