no they did not state it in the view of an idol, however they did state that their 'classes' were not including areas like med, science, etc. which you went ahead and used as your example anyways. And what difference is there to tuition cost and costs of living with a student already in university and one that still in the process of enrolling? The student already enrolled is still paying off that tuition and living cost. The main comment was the lack of financial aid being the reason why students are not able to attend classes, having to work in order to pay tuition and costs of living, which you brushed off as 'its not hard to get a degree go to classes' as if those students working full time while in school were simply not attending class and sitting at home.

You're grades are the only reflection of your effort into a course. Attending a lecture is not a representation of that whatsoever, unless its your attendance that is the result of your grades falling. Placing a false 'care' factor into this is absurd. You judge someone 'caring' about their education based on their attendance than go a head and give them a stamp on the hand or a gold star sticker, but don't go assuming someone is not as dedicated to their field just because they choose to do something else with their time rather than listen to a lecture for a few hours. Caring about that title and piece of paper which are the acknowledgement of your skill set is far more logical than caring about that attendance record for the sake of some 'care' factor someone else is placing on your studies. When last i checked it was that title and piece of paper that you came for not the perfect attendance record. Every professor may have the education to back up their position in a field but that does not mean that every professor has the skill set to pass that on, most are terrible at teaching despite being genius at their own work.

The courses you list are limited to the amount of students that take those programs. An art student isn't going to need a BS to get their job, their career is aligned completely different to a career that requires a BS or PHD. Those programs have no relevance towards the programs that these idols take part in, when they refer to 'most' classes they are probably speaking about similar programs to the ones the idols are taking without taking into consideration programs for math, science etc. A career in music, art etc. the ones where you place lower worth on are never subjected to the same 'demand' that the ones you place high worth (doctors, scientist etc.) on are. .

It isn't difficult to attend classes if you're straight out of high school and willing to take on a shit load of debt or have a slightly wealthy upbringing where you suck your parents dry. The reality is that it depends on where you're from. Some countries subsidize tuition others do not. Some cities have crazy costs of living on top of the high tuition others do not. A student from an above average income family in a country that subsidizes all or part of tuition and is attending classes in a city where living costs are minimal can't be compared to a student from a family that is making average or below average income, in a country that does not subsidize tuition and living in city where housing and rent are double the norm. You may belong to that first category and have the luxury to say its easy to go to college/university and not worry about costs etc. but to ignorantly brush aside someone else who belongs to the second category is just silly. The cost of education and its related issues such as costs of living is a global issue and has been for decades, students around the world have brought the issue up plentiful times.

The other issue is work experience, no matter what level of education you get if you have no experience working in that field your chances of getting the job are always lower, the one thing that students never really pay attention to until they finish their degrees and start job searching. There's a ton of people out there with their degrees sitting on a shelf having to take on jobs unrelated to their field to get by because they don't have the experience

However if your from S.Korea or Japan or China or heck maybe any Asian country than the jobs come to you regardless of your experience solely based on the University you graduate from, and of course your grades which in those countries will be highly dependent on your attendance at least if your taking a program that is hands on approached like med school, law etc.

that can't be what gets you cause that's not even an issue that has been brought up. The concept of classroom availability has never been an issue brought up regarding any course that idols are partaking in. Based on information available classroom availability is not an issue, more students applying for the course simply means larger classroom sizes or hiring an extra prof on contract. These idols do not have the grades to get into exclusive programs where class room sizes are limited due to demand.

you shouldn't have to attend class to graduate a college/university. As long as you still complete the required work and write the exams along with paying tuition there's no reason for failure based on attendance. That is a joke of a rule only enforced by countries that are likewise jokes. There are plenty of students who acquire degrees without attending the majority of lectures. Not attending class can jeopardize someones grades based on their learning experience, the inability to keep up with class material etc leading to failed assignments and exams but to have a degree taken away despite having grades that meet requirements solely on the premise that they did not attend lectures is a joke.

I think he meant as a side dish. I've worked in banquet settings in two locations here in Canada and along with turkey, mash potatoes, stuffing and the usual, Caesar salad was always the main salad served on buffet lines. Not saying that there wasn't any other salads offered (usually at least a variety of 4 offered) but it was always the biggest bowl on the line. Side note* Mark would have celebrated his thanksgiving on the 2nd Monday of October rather than the last Thursday of November.

hes not an insider. Hes a financial analyst doing his job. All that means is that the stock is now lower and those with financial knowledge can decide to invest or not based on whether they still think the projections that JYP, SM and YG made will be reached. Or buy and stick around to reap the rewards of more than just 1 quarter in a year. The ones who sold were expecting profits for quick cash, more than likely a lot of amateur stock holders or people who buy and sell repeatedly throughout the year but for smaller quick cash gains.

Its not toxic nor is it anything like gambling. There are people who choose to use it in that way but that is their decision. If your on the stock market trying to buy and sell without any financial knowledge and simply buy or sell based on 'tips' or 'good feelings' or panic sell just because a stock dips than you would be better off putting your money in a savings account. The stock market is used for company's wanting to acquire funds for growth, investors choose to invest their money so that they can earn something back while assisting that company in achieving their growth. In order to do that you as an investor have to put in the time and effort to research whether that risk involved is low enough to invest your money. There are times where the risks are high but potential payout is worth the risk some would see that as gambling but gambling is based solely on luck where as the stock market isn't. Those high risk, high payout investments aren't based on luck, they're based on financial numbers, peoples hard work, jobs being created and services being provided. When people lose money on the stock market its due to outside factors like fraud, hacking, natural disasters etc.

There are some other things to take into account. We don't know what kind of dividend policy they would use. Whether or not they choose to declare those dividends or keep that cash for future internal use. We can't assume what kind of capital structure they have and if the indications affecting the big three have any affect on Big Hits Q3 performance. (there could be other contributions other than that one source that Allkpop is citing) There's a lot of amateurs on the stock market that react to news with panic by selling or buying based on little financial information but simply out of their own emotions. Those individuals usually cause a big chunk of the stock price fluctuations. You and your friend rely on financial information when investing but a lot of people think the stock market is a place to gamble which it isn't. Even without knowing about their dividend policy and whether or not the big 3 were taken down a notch due to one source or many, your assumption of breaking Q3 records and possible high dividend payout would probably still be correct given the situation Big Hit currently is in. I don't see them needing the bulk of earnings for internal growth unless they plan on debuting more than 1 new group or buying a new building. Even as a private company they would be handing out dividend payouts to their shareholders seeing as the company is still only owned by 3 main investors, the equity firm that recently acquired shares, Bang PD and his brother's gaming company.