Find Friend(s)
Chat
CHAT ROOMS
KPOP Lounge

Current Events

Man tries to kill his own puppy and kitten that he had just bought

By alice101   Saturday, November 5, 2016   35,461   315   34
buzz

0

0

SHARES
  1. Google+

A man who killed a kitten and seriously injured a puppy out of anger has received his sentence for animal abuse. 


According to the police report, the 48-year-old man with the surname Park tried to check into a motel in Suwon with the animals he had just purchased at a market earlier that day. When the motel said that animals are not allowed in, Park became upset and threw the puppy and kitten on the floor. The kitten died from injuries suffered from the throw while the puppy was seriously injured. 


SEE ALSO: New statue resembling Kim Yuna creating a buzz because of the low quality


The Suwon district court stated, "Based on the evidence submitted by the prosecution, the defendant is guilty as charged. However, the defendant admits his guilt and is repentant. He bought the animals in order to live with them, and the crime was not premeditated," explaining his sentence to pay a fine of 700,000 KRW (~$700 USD).

  1. Buzz


intricate Sunday, November 6, 2016

wtf poor creatures :'(

intricate Sunday, November 6, 2016

why didn't he just return those animals? the law doesn't seem to have any provisions on how to deal with this sort of thing. The punishment seems to be more for crimes related to unnecessary suffering of animals who are killed for consumption, like improper slaughtering methods for farm animals and the like. But this was clearly different... what that guy did was an act of pure violence in an uncontrolled manner. It's pretty obvious that guy's got some serious issues. You don't go out to buy a puppy and a kitten to live with them just for the heck of it, you do it because you're lonely.

kimmiefonze Sunday, November 6, 2016

People who kill animals, not for consumption and/or survival, have the highest tendency to kill another human being. Law makers should take this into serious consideration regarding animal abuse cases.

bakanishela Sunday, November 6, 2016

WTF.. that's it??? Only paying the $700 fine??? WTF IS WRONG WITH S.Korea law!!!!!! If any man could kill/abused the pets... they could kill a human being too!!!!!!!

ryokucha Sunday, November 6, 2016

That's it?????? $700???????????

Gallifreyan7 Sunday, November 6, 2016

WTF ?!!! Who cares whether he's repetant or that the crime wasn't premeditated ! This is horrible and 700 USD isn't enough. I'm not really surprised though. After all in Korea when you rape someone you only get one year in jail so...

L_catzzz Sunday, November 6, 2016

EHHHHHHHHH~

SuperFly_Snuka Sunday, November 6, 2016

Wtf 😂

Jarhon (Banned) Saturday, November 5, 2016

This comment has been removed due to violation of our TOS. (Reason: spammer)

Jarhon (Banned) Saturday, November 5, 2016

This comment has been removed due to violation of our TOS. (Reason: spammer)

thieves  Jarhon (Banned) Saturday, November 5, 2016

He's well within his own rights to take an animal to an institution (i.e. a veterinarian) to be put down, not to kill it himself when it is perfectly healthy. It is a little different in more rural areas for obvious reasons. Hitting an animal against a floor or wall, though? Rarely. Try shooting. And again, generally animals which are sick or injured are killed rather than unwanted animals. In this case, it was animal abuse. Unlike you said, this manner is obviously not a "swift and relatively painless" way to kill animals - the dog survived, after all.

zippys420  Jarhon (Banned) Saturday, November 5, 2016

Context much? You're a fucking idiot.

Jarhon (Banned) thieves Sunday, November 6, 2016

This comment has been removed due to violation of our TOS. (Reason: spammer)

El_Bartolina  Jarhon (Banned) Sunday, November 6, 2016

Except he didn't had to kill the animals. If he had just bought them, I'm assuming they were healthy, so there was no need to kill them. And second, if he got angry that they didn't allow animals there and, instead of going to look for another motel or whatever, he threw the animals to the grown hard enought to kill one and severely injure the other, he has anger issues and needs treatment. In my opinion he shouls get worse than a fine he should get jail, but just talking without opinions, this man seems to be a danger to society

Jarhon (Banned) El_Bartolina Sunday, November 6, 2016

This comment has been removed due to violation of our TOS. (Reason: spammer)

El_Bartolina  Jarhon (Banned) Sunday, November 6, 2016

My or other people? And if it's me, delusional about what?

El_Bartolina Sunday, November 6, 2016

me*

intricate  Jarhon (Banned) Sunday, November 6, 2016

yeah.. or... you know... the law is actually meant to deal with farmers and farm animals to prevent farmers from keeping them in bad conditions and slaughtering them improperly... The farmer would get fined separately for every abused animal. This particular law is obviously not meant to deal with animals that are virtually never kept in large numbers by the same person. Therefore neither the crime nor the punishment fit the law in this case.

oxymorac Saturday, November 5, 2016

$700 is so little! He could be jailed for this in my country. It's disgusting how some people treat their pets as inferior and do whatever they want with them.

Got7_Red_Velvet Saturday, November 5, 2016

Omg this is just vicious, animals abuse must be taken seriously as human abuse, like what did they ever did to you?!

Load More Comments

GET AKP IN YOUR INBOX!

CONNECT WITH ALLKPOP

  1. Follow us on Instagram
  2. Subscribe on Youtube
  3. Follow us on Google+

BRAND PARTNERS

wana
wana
$18
love
love
$18
iu
iu
$18
akp
akp
$20